Recent economic data show that U.S. job growth in May was negligible, while the official unemployment figure – at least the figure the Labor Department admits to – rose to 9.1%. The real unemployment figure, however, as compiled by economist John Williams, may well be higher than 20%. It is clear the U.S. economy is in terrible shape, and that no amount of government spending or Federal Reserve quantitative easing can reduce unemployment, increase real productivity, or address our debt fiasco. U.S. jobs and productivity are dependent on the accumulation of private capital to finance existing businesses or fund new entrepreneurial activity. Private capital – whether accumulated by profitable U.S. businesses, invested by private equity and venture capital firms, or attracted from abroad – is the key to economic growth and new jobs. But we cannot create jobs if we demonize profits, punish risk-taking capitalists, and stay hostile to foreign investment. The steps to encouraging capital investment and creating new jobs in America are simple, though not easy: • First and foremost, we must create a sound U.S. currency backed by gold or some other commodity respected by the market. No nation in history with a rapidly depreciating currency has attracted private capital. Unless and until we prohibit the Treasury and Federal Reserve from essentially creating money and credit from thin air, we cannot restore the U.S. economy. • Second, we must create a favorable regulatory environment for U.S. business. This cannot be stressed enough. When businesses don’t know what’s coming next from the EPA, when Obamacare spikes their healthcare costs, or when the Dodd-Frank bill adds almost unknowable regulatory compliance burdens, businesses simply will not expand and hire. It is time to start shrinking the federal register. • Third, we must stop spending trillions of dollars overseas on foreign wars. There is no point in debating a foreign policy we cannot afford. It no longer matters what neoconservatives want. Our interventionist foreign policy is financed on credit, and our credit limit has been reached. Our economy would be infinitely better off if those trillions of dollars had never been removed from the private economy or added to our debt. • Finally, we must completely revamp the U.S. tax system and move to a territorial model that does not tax foreign source income. U.S. corporations are sitting on more than a trillion dollars in foreign earnings that cannot be repatriated to the U.S. because of taxes. We need to stop taxing unpatriated funds to bring those earnings home. Better yet, we need to abolish the income tax altogether. The U.S. economy is in deep trouble. Congress needs to act immediately to restore the rule of law and create an environment that rewards, rather than punishes, the critical components of any healthy economy: capital accumulation and investment. In this struggling economy it is essential for politicians to take a step back and think about what government has been doing to business in this country. In less than 200 years, the free market, property rights, and respect for the rule of law took this nation from a rough frontier to a global economic superpower. Today, however, our nation and our economy clearly are headed in the wrong direction. Of course, America has never enjoyed absolute freemarket capitalism: creeping government intrusion and special interest political patronage have existed and increased since our founding. But America historically has permitted free markets to operate with less government interference than other nations, while showing greater respect for property rights and the rule of law. Less government, respect for private property, and a relatively stable legal environment allowed America to become the wealthiest nation on earth. By contrast, the poorest nations almost always demonstrate hostility for free markets, private property, and the rule of law. Capital formation, entrepreneurship, credit, and wealth accumulation are uniformly discouraged in poor countries. Private contracts are not reliably enforced, and private property is not secure in the hands of owners. The predictable result is widespread poverty and misery.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina will refund $155.8 million to individual policyholders in an agreement with state regulators tied to the federal health reform act.
The state’s largest health insurer will provide refunds equivalent to more than 1.5 months of premiums to more than 215,000 holders of Blue Advantage or Blue Options HSA for Individuals policies that were in force as of March 23, 2010, the date the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act went into effect. The refunds will vary depending on specific premium rates, according to a joint statement from the North Carolina Department of Insurance and BCBSNC. For an average policyholder’s monthly premium of about $380, it would be approximately $690. The refunds will be issued by the end of the year.
The refunds stem from new rating and grandfathering rules in the act and will be paid from active life reserves, portions of the premium set aside in the early years of a policy to pay future claims and stabilize rates as an insured’s medical expenses rise during the life of a policy. Policies purchased or “substantially modified” after March 23 will end in 2014, when new products will be introduced as the health care act’s provisions on state insurance exchanges and other aspects go into effect.
The insurance department also approved rate adjustments to the two health insurance products. It approved BCBSNC’s 2.1% rate increase request for the Blue Options HSA for individuals. The department approved a 5.4% hike for Blue Advantage policies; BCBSNC had requested a 7.0% increase
“I’m pleased that the department and Blue Cross were able to identify a way for $155.8 million to go back into consumers’ wallets,” Insurance Commissioner Wayne Goodwin said in a statement. “I’m also glad that we were able to negotiate a lower-than-requested rate adjustment that will save $14.5 million in future premiums for policyholders.”
The agreement was a “collaborative process” between the department and the insurer, BCBSNC spokesman Lew Borman said. “These were funds we didn’t need to hold any more,” he said.
In August, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina announced plans to lay off up to 90 employees in what it called an effort to cut administrative costs in response to the health care reform law. The insurer said it will outsource some claims data entry work and related functions, which will result in the elimination of 80 to 90 jobs over the next nine months. The move will result in annual savings of about $1.6 million to $2.1 million, with most of the job cuts expected to occur between January and May of next year (BestWire, Aug. 16, 2010).
The insurer spends 87% of premium dollars on medical care, while the remainder is spent on customer service, information technology and other administrative expense, Borman said previously (BestWire, July 14, 2010). Under the reform act, health insurers will be required to pay a minimum percentage of premiums back out in actual medical costs — 85% for large-group plans and 80% for small groups and individual plans.
(By Sean P. Carr, Washington Correspondent: firstname.lastname@example.org)